Part X – Conclusion
Part X describes the perpetual fraud on the Supreme Court that exists today, how the Administration misjudged the states willingness to set up exchanges and why the facts in the case dictate that the Supreme Court should rule unanimously in King v. Burwell that the ACA is null and void. One schedule is attached to Part X.
ACA is Null and Void Part IX Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX – Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX describes how the right of free speech and the right to financial information have been violated. It reviews important history prior to the Constitutional Convention that has been left out of legal discussions regarding the Statement and Account Clause and the Appropriations Clauses.
Part III – Federal Government’s Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Part III reviews the details of the federal government’s fraudulent financial reporting. The fraud is primarily based on the creation of a different definition of a “liability” for financial reporting purposes than for Appropriations law purposes. However, it also entails creating accounting rules that require that legal obligations for Appropriations law purposes that are not a “liability” as defined for financial reporting purposes shall not be recorded in the government’s financial statements.
Part II – Fraudulent State & Federal Financial Reporting – Summary of Arguments
Part II lays out the arguments describing how and why state and federal government’s financial statements are fraudulent and violate the antifraud provisions of the nation’s securities laws and/or the Statement and Account and Appropriations Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
- Eugene P. and Delia S. Murphy Conference on Corporate Law
- Representation Without Accountability?
- Business Law Practitioners Series – Fall 2011
- The Philosophy and Practice of Disclosure
- BLPS – Rory Cutaia ’85
- The Looming Problems of The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
- Financial Reform Legislation: There Ought To Be A Law, But Is This It?
News & Events
- Corporate Compliance Institute (7/6/2015 – 7/10/2015)
- Fifth Annual Antitrust Enforcement in the Americas (6/23/2015)
- Third Annual Antitrust Enforcement in the Americas (6/23/2015)
- Business Law Practitioners Series Program for Students (4/14/2015)
- Judging Statutes: A Book Talk with The Honorable Robert A. Katzmann (4/13/2015)
- New: How Corporate Governance Is Made: The Case of the Golden Leash July 24, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogThis Article presents a case study of a corporate governance innovation — the incentive compensation arrangement for activist-nominated director candidates colloquially known as the “golden leash.” Golden leash compensation arrangements are a potentially valuable tool for activist shareholders in election contests. In response to their use, several […]Sean J. Griffith
- REVISION: The Artificial Collective-Action Problem in Lawsuits Against Insured Defendants July 7, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogIn lawsuits against defendants covered by liability insurance, the parties negotiate toward a single settlement amount that collectively binds the plaintiff and all defense-side parties (the defendant and its liability insurer). This settlement method produces a collective-action problem whenever the trial outcome is uncertain and the potential […]Richard C. Squire
- Corporate Compliance Institute (7/6/2015 – 7/10/2015) July 6, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogStart Date: 7/6/2015 Start Time: 1:00 PMEnd Date: 7/10/2015 End Time: 1:00 PMLincoln Center Campus - Fordham University School of LawLincoln Center Campus - Fordham University School of LawRoom: 4-07Summer Compliance Train...This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogFORDHAM SCHOOL OF LAW - Corporate Law Center Events Calendar for Fordham University
Highlights From Previous Books
THE BEHAVIORAL PARADOX: WHY INVESTOR IRRATIONALITY CALLS FOR LIGHTER AND SIMPLER FINANCIAL REGULATION
It is widely believed that behavioral economics justifies more intrusive regulation of financial markets, because people are not fully rational and need to be protected from their quirks. This Article challenges that belief. Firstly, insofar as people can be helped to make better choices, that goal can usually be achieved through light-touch regulations. Secondly, faulty […]