Part X – Conclusion
Part X describes the perpetual fraud on the Supreme Court that exists today, how the Administration misjudged the states willingness to set up exchanges and why the facts in the case dictate that the Supreme Court should rule unanimously in King v. Burwell that the ACA is null and void. One schedule is attached to Part X.
ACA is Null and Void Part IX Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX – Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX describes how the right of free speech and the right to financial information have been violated. It reviews important history prior to the Constitutional Convention that has been left out of legal discussions regarding the Statement and Account Clause and the Appropriations Clauses.
Part III – Federal Government’s Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Part III reviews the details of the federal government’s fraudulent financial reporting. The fraud is primarily based on the creation of a different definition of a “liability” for financial reporting purposes than for Appropriations law purposes. However, it also entails creating accounting rules that require that legal obligations for Appropriations law purposes that are not a “liability” as defined for financial reporting purposes shall not be recorded in the government’s financial statements.
Part II – Fraudulent State & Federal Financial Reporting – Summary of Arguments
Part II lays out the arguments describing how and why state and federal government’s financial statements are fraudulent and violate the antifraud provisions of the nation’s securities laws and/or the Statement and Account and Appropriations Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
- Eugene P. and Delia S. Murphy Conference on Corporate Law
- Representation Without Accountability?
- Business Law Practitioners Series – Fall 2011
- The Philosophy and Practice of Disclosure
- BLPS – Rory Cutaia ’85
- The Looming Problems of The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
- Financial Reform Legislation: There Ought To Be A Law, But Is This It?
News & Events
- REVISION: Contra Proferentem and the Role of the Jury in Contract Interpretation November 1, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogRevisiting Bill Whitford’s work on the role of the jury in contract interpretation and his work on consumer form contracting inspired us to take a careful look at a doctrine of contract interpretation that is usually thought to help consumers in interpretive battles with those who draft […]Steven Thel
- New Website Coming Fall 2015! September 21, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogWe are excited to announce that the Journal of Corporate & Financial Law will soon launch a new website, with a fresh look and user-friendly navigation. Our goal is to create a space for corporate and financial content that is easy to navigate and share. The new […]Online Managing Editor
- New: Austerity, Debt Overhang, and the Design of International Standards on Sovereign,
Corporate, and Consumer Debt Restructuring August 28, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogFollowing the Asian Financial Crisis, sovereign debt defaults prompted calls by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a statutory Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM). In promoting the SDRM, IMF leaders argued that countries’ sovereign debt problems needed something like U.S. Chapter 11, which is to say that […]Susan Block-Lieb
Highlights From Previous Books
THE BEHAVIORAL PARADOX: WHY INVESTOR IRRATIONALITY CALLS FOR LIGHTER AND SIMPLER FINANCIAL REGULATION
It is widely believed that behavioral economics justifies more intrusive regulation of financial markets, because people are not fully rational and need to be protected from their quirks. This Article challenges that belief. Firstly, insofar as people can be helped to make better choices, that goal can usually be achieved through light-touch regulations. Secondly, faulty […]