Part X – Conclusion
Part X describes the perpetual fraud on the Supreme Court that exists today, how the Administration misjudged the states willingness to set up exchanges and why the facts in the case dictate that the Supreme Court should rule unanimously in King v. Burwell that the ACA is null and void. One schedule is attached to Part X.
ACA is Null and Void Part IX Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX – Right of Free Speech and Right to Financial Information Have Been Violated
Part IX describes how the right of free speech and the right to financial information have been violated. It reviews important history prior to the Constitutional Convention that has been left out of legal discussions regarding the Statement and Account Clause and the Appropriations Clauses.
Part VIII – The Financial Status of Medicaid Pre- & Post-ACA
Part VIII describes the size and scope of the nation’s Medicaid program before and after passage of the ACA.
Part VII – The Financial Status of the Nation and Social Insurance Post-ACA
This Part provides a description of the financial status of the nation and Medicare post-enactment of the ACA. Eight schedules are attached to Part VII.
Part VI – The Financial Status of the Nation and Social Insurance Pre-ACA
This Part provides an overview of Medicare and describes the financial status of the nation and social insurance programs pre-enactment of the ACA. Seven schedules are attached to Part VI.
Part V – State Governments’ Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Cover-up
Part V reviews the details of the state governments’ fraudulent financial reporting as well as their efforts to cover-up the fraud.
Part IV – Federal Government’s Cover-up
Part IV reviews the federal government’s extensive efforts to cover-up its fraud.
Part III – Federal Government’s Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Part III reviews the details of the federal government’s fraudulent financial reporting. The fraud is primarily based on the creation of a different definition of a “liability” for financial reporting purposes than for Appropriations law purposes. However, it also entails creating accounting rules that require that legal obligations for Appropriations law purposes that are not a “liability” as defined for financial reporting purposes shall not be recorded in the government’s financial statements.
Part II – Fraudulent State & Federal Financial Reporting – Summary of Arguments
Part II lays out the arguments describing how and why state and federal government’s financial statements are fraudulent and violate the antifraud provisions of the nation’s securities laws and/or the Statement and Account and Appropriations Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
- Eugene P. and Delia S. Murphy Conference on Corporate Law
- Representation Without Accountability?
- Business Law Practitioners Series – Fall 2011
- The Philosophy and Practice of Disclosure
- BLPS – Rory Cutaia ’85
- The Looming Problems of The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
- Financial Reform Legislation: There Ought To Be A Law, But Is This It?
News & Events
- Business Law Practitioners Series Program for Students (4/14/2015)
- Judging Statutes: A Book Talk with The Honorable Robert A. Katzmann (4/13/2015)
- Comparative Corporate Governance Distinguished Lecture (4/8/2015)
- Raising Your First Million: How You Turn Your Idea Into a Company (4/1/2015)
- Third Annual Fred Dunbar Memorial Lecture in Law and Economics (3/31/2015)
- New: International Relations Theories and International Law May 17, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogThis brief essay describes the main approaches to explaining international relations and how they might be useful in understanding international law. As used in academic discourse in the United States, international relations (IR) theory is a sub-field of political science that applies the methods of modern social […]Thomas H. Lee
- REVISION: Principal Costs May 5, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogThis Article offers a new theory of the optimal division of control between investors and managers in a business firm. We argue that the optimal division of control minimizes the sum of agency costs and what we call principal costs. Principal costs arise when investors exercise control […]Richard C. Squire
- REVISION: The Artificial Collective-Action Problem in Lawsuits Against Insured Defendants April 30, 2015This post appeared first on Fordham Corporate Law BlogIn lawsuits against defendants covered by liability insurance, the parties negotiate toward a single settlement amount that collectively binds the plaintiff and all defense-side parties (the defendant and its liability insurer). This settlement method produces a collective-action problem whenever the trial outcome is uncertain and the potential […]Richard C. Squire
Highlights From Previous Books
THE BEHAVIORAL PARADOX: WHY INVESTOR IRRATIONALITY CALLS FOR LIGHTER AND SIMPLER FINANCIAL REGULATION
It is widely believed that behavioral economics justifies more intrusive regulation of financial markets, because people are not fully rational and need to be protected from their quirks. This Article challenges that belief. Firstly, insofar as people can be helped to make better choices, that goal can usually be achieved through light-touch regulations. Secondly, faulty […]